Introduction

The recent launch of Crimson Desert has sparked discussions among players regarding the authenticity of its art assets. Despite a successful debut with over two million players, some users have expressed concerns about the presence of potentially AI-generated artwork within the game. This controversy highlights ongoing debates about the use of artificial intelligence in the gaming industry.

Player Observations

Players have taken to social media platforms to voice their suspicions, particularly regarding certain visual elements such as signs and paintings scattered throughout the game world of Pywel. Specific examples include:

• A painting depicting two swordsmen with unusual angles.
• Images featuring characters possessing exaggerated or distorted features, like oddly shaped fingers.
• Another artwork showcasing various men and horses, where the horse’s legs appeared notably inconsistent.

The discrepancies observed in these art pieces have led to discussions about the possibility of generative AI being employed in their creation. In particular, certain artworks exhibit characteristics that seem inconsistent with traditional human artistry, prompting deeper scrutiny.

Context of AI in Gaming

The usage of generative AI in video games has become a hot topic in the industry, with numerous companies facing scrutiny for either confirming its use or being suspected of integrating AI-generated content. Notable instances include:

1. Nintendo: The company was forced to deny allegations of using generative AI for billboards in Mario Kart World.
2. Activision: There has been continued criticism regarding AI assets found in the Call of Duty franchise.
3. Electronic Arts (EA): Similar backlash arose concerning AI-generated content in Battlefield.
4. Larian Studios: The studio faced public backlash when it was revealed that Divinity utilized generative AI for some aspects of its development.
5. Clair Obscur: Expedition 33: This indie title lost its Game of the Year award after an unintentional AI asset appeared in the final release.

Although these controversies have not significantly affected the sales performance of the involved titles, they have influenced public perception and sparked discussions about ethics in game development.

Implications for Crimson Desert

If the art assets in Crimson Desert are indeed the product of generative AI, it would raise questions about compliance with Steam’s policies regarding AI-generated content. According to these guidelines, developers are required to disclose the use of AI in their products on the game’s store page. As of this writing, Crimson Desert does not include any such disclosure.

In response to these allegations, inquiries have been made to Pearl Abyss, the developer of Crimson Desert, seeking clarification on whether AI was utilized in the creation of the game’s finalized assets. It is worth noting that the studio previously received positive attention for confirming that all primary and quest-related non-player characters (NPCs) were voiced by human actors, negating the use of AI in this aspect.

Conclusion

The emergence of potential AI-generated art in Crimson Desert serves as a reminder of the ongoing debates surrounding the role of artificial intelligence in creative industries. As the gaming landscape continues to evolve, it will be essential for developers to address the implications of AI usage transparently to maintain consumer trust and adhere to industry standards.

Related reading: История Resident Evil 1.5: Как неудачный проект стал легендой, Історія Resident Evil 1.5: Гра, що не дожила до релізу and The Lost Chapter of Resident Evil: The Untold Story of RE1.5.